Skip to main content

Rinse Cricket's Linen Right Now!

Match-fixing has been cricket’s biggest downer over the last decade or so and recent revelations and consequent punishments suggest that the saga hasn’t ceased. Committing mistakes is not a problem but not attempting to rectify them is a bigger problem. When the corruption charges were proved first about a decade ago the cricketing community was shocked and the game’s repute was at stake. Names with impeccable integrity and transparency sailed cricket through that tough weather.

Times have changed: match-fixing allegations don’t raise your eyebrows instantaneously anymore, instead of complete matches’, manipulation of a few moments have come to the fore, cricket players have been jailed for proven corruption charges yet you get a sense not enough efforts are going in to make the game transparent.

The ICC’s anti-corruption and security unit (ACSU) has been bestowed upon the duty of keeping a vigil on any possible malpractices since its origin in 2000. Either the ACSU officials are under-empowered or ill equipped to monitor and access malpractices in the game, for too many allegations/proven sting operations have come from non-official agencies. Whenever a terror attack is executed, we shouldn’t forget that the security forces bust 9 out of the 10 such attempts; likewise the ACSU shouldn’t be looked upon as a weak cop but a body that is going about its business in a quiet manner. We live in a result-oriented age, and hence everybody is expected to deliver 100% and nothing less than that; the number of sting-operation led busts of fixing charges raise questions about ACSU’s role.

ICC with its limited reach is trying to exploit as much as it can via ACSU, the national boards need to step up as well. Players have been caught indulging in corruption at the domestic level in England and India. Punishments have been imposed, popular statements aka ‘we won’t tolerate…’ etc. have been rolled out and there is that full-stop. There is a lot to be done but national boards appear to have a stance of non-action until it reaches a point of compulsive action.

When we are looking upon this subject, we need to classify players into different categories - established international players, fringe international players, seasoned domestic players, fringe domestic players, T20 league players. Let us try and delineate this topic briefly. Established international players today are associated with some sports management company or the other (a fine piece on that subject). Though this can be streamlined in a much better way globally, like Australia and England are doing, it is a positive start nonetheless. Fringe domestic players would comprise of those who have just graduated out of club or sub-domestic cricket; players who don’t have big shot sponsors or less vulnerable to getting influenced. Players falling into these two categories should be expected to be least involved with corruption acts. The other three categories can easily be qualified as those falling into the vulnerable category. So what could be done?

Once a player starts playing domestic cricket his off-field activity (with respect to cricket) should be monitored by the national board via some mechanism (maybe by monitoring his balance sheets) from that very moment; for example his dealings with his sponsors’, his meetings with people during matches. T20 leagues are possibly the future of cricket but they are too inclusive (in terms of activity) to be kept a tab on. If the game has to survive with minimal corruption, keeping a tight leash on monetarily activity on T20 leagues should be executed with priority. When a child is punished for a wrongdoing during his early age, he tends to avoid repeating that act. Likewise if a player’s activity is strictly monitored during his domestic career, chances are less that he would commit a corrupt act whenever he goes through a period of instant fame and money or short-lived fame and money. Cricket is described as a gentlemen’s game but (sadly) today the time has come that it is the prerogative of anti-corruption bodies to ensure that only gentlemen take the cricket field!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should Cricket Embrace The 5 Rings?

Another glorious edition of the Olympics goes into the sunset. A couple of weeks that showcased the best athletes compete for the ultimate glory, an event that exhibited disappointment, defeat, joy, pride, victory, glory and a portrait that had participation from 204 nations! A rich history, a massive platform, unparalleled glory and probably the biggest show sports can offer, makes an Olympic Games edition stand out. Ardent cricket fans/followers would feel left out from this marquee sports event. Unlike Motorsports, Cricket is a recognized by the International Olympic Committee. Though cricket wasn’t an outright success in multi-sport models previously, times have changed and today cricket has its T20 avatar to offer for such events. The ICC has 105 countries as its recognized members, spanning continents and covering most of the globe.

Adieu Rahul Dravid

It could have been timed better, it could have come a little later, it could have been better celebrated but the retirement was always going to come some day. It is easier said than fathomed - the Indian test side without Dravid! The news on first instance was a moment of disbelief, followed by a moment of daze before logic struck saying that it had to come and the moment had indeed arrived. Dravid was never a glamorous character on or off the field, more of a thorough gentleman commanding respect from all quarters. His announcement was synonymous with his usual self - calm, composed, dignified and non-fussy. Dravid was, is and will always be remembered as a role model for his conduct, dignity, selflessness  on the cricket field & off it  along-with his technically impeccable batting. On the global scene the game has lost one of its modern-day great and an all-time legend. The clock was ticking for Dravid much before, but an exceptional tour of England postponed this event (

India's problems begin from the top!

The middle order of India’s batting line-up has been the focus of all the criticism in the last couple of months. Amidst this chatter, an aspect of India’s success over the last decade or so - the opening has been a bit neglected. Yes the middle order deserves all the flak and resurrection in that department should be executed with priority but you cannot overlook the constant failure of the openers to deliver what is expected of them. Sehwag & Gambhir has been India’s best opening combine in terms of runs and also the longest serving duo. When you have the same pair at the top, you either don’t have too many options or they are doing too well to disturb; 23 opening stands of 50 or more & 10 stands of 100+ out of 76 outings is a reasonable stat and should endorse the latter view. Dissect that stat a bit and a few creepy things crop up. The duo has managed to provide an opening stand of 100 or more only on 3 occasions out of 34 times they have gone out to open the batting on