Skip to main content

India's All-rounder Obsession!


India’s 16 that were picked for the Sri Lankan tour originally didn’t have an ‘all-rounder’; a few eyebrows rose as a consequence. A fast bowler gets injured and an all-rounder is drafted into the mix as the replacement! Indian team selections or replacements have never been flawless, in terms of reasoning or justification, and neither been according to logic, at times!

The debate around Irfan getting a chance at international cricket is a different topic altogether. The bigger picture is that around the obsession surrounding the word ‘all-rounder’ in and around India’s cricketing circles. How would you define an all-rounder in cricket? It is such a subjective question to answer and more so when we have a habit of analyzing the game so much that we demand a certain set of numbers to qualify a player as an all-rounder.

The legacy of the all-rounder community is pretty rich; Kapil Dev, Ian Botham, Imran Khan et al. The modern day generation has names like Flintoff, Kallis, Cairns, Harris, Razzaq and currently Shakib Al Hasan, Watson, Hafeez etc. What knit these names together are their performances in 50-over or the impact their dual armory (fielding not included as it may or may not be an attribute) has had in ODI cricket. Test cricket and test teams are generally chosen with specialists forming the core and the all-rounder, if any, is expected to chip in. In 50-over cricket the all-rounder is the go-to man for the captain; can expect him to deliver as a floater in the batting order or throw the ball to him to break a partnership. In T20 cricket you don’t need a ‘genuine’ all-rounder to constitute your line-up, for part-time bowlers or pinch-hitters can satiate that requirement.

50-over cricket is thus the ideal format for an all-rounder to display and maximize his dual skills. If statistics are the basis, India has had in its history only 20 all-rounder (min. 500 runs and 25 wickets in ODI cricket); 20 out of 193 that have played ODI cricket for India! India’s obsession (fans, media, team, critics included) for a genuine all-rounder have never been fictitious but have never had an answer. Robin Singh, Ravi Shastri, Manoj Prabhakar, Ajay Jadeja were a few names that contested for the role of the allrounder. Recently we have had Agarkar, Irfan, Ravindra Jadeja, and Yusuf Pathan featuring in that role. Indian cricket followers have never been satisfied with the execution of the role of any player in the shoes of ‘all-rounder’; either the player is forced to squeeze one attribute of his arsenal or expected to be infallible in either skill!

It is a fact that India has never managed to produce ‘the-genuine’ all-rounder; there could be a few reasons for that. Indian culture hasn’t produced too many physically strong cricket players. School cricket, domestic cricket doesn’t encourage dual skilled players, as subsequent promotion is based more on numbers. Selectors aren’t clear with what they expect the all-rounder to deliver, consequently creeping in confusion. India won the world cup last year without major contributions from the ‘genuine’ all-rounder but rather from a batsman who could fill in 10 overs with success. The all-rounder puzzle continues to remain an unsolved mystery in Indian cricket and the search to find the missing link doesn’t cease. Irfan Pathan is back in the fold; will have an opportunity to prove a point, but like Sidharth Monga suggests he himself remains a bit of a puzzle! MS Dhoni may or may not be satisfied with Irfan’s inclusion but for an Indian fan’s sake the inclusion of a genuine ‘all-rounder’ is a reassuring move!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Adieu Rahul Dravid

It could have been timed better, it could have come a little later, it could have been better celebrated but the retirement was always going to come some day. It is easier said than fathomed - the Indian test side without Dravid! The news on first instance was a moment of disbelief, followed by a moment of daze before logic struck saying that it had to come and the moment had indeed arrived. Dravid was never a glamorous character on or off the field, more of a thorough gentleman commanding respect from all quarters. His announcement was synonymous with his usual self - calm, composed, dignified and non-fussy. Dravid was, is and will always be remembered as a role model for his conduct, dignity, selflessness  on the cricket field & off it  along-with his technically impeccable batting. On the global scene the game has lost one of its modern-day great and an all-time legend. The clock was ticking for Dravid much before, but an exceptional tour of England postpone...
4 comments
Read more

India's problems begin from the top!

The middle order of India’s batting line-up has been the focus of all the criticism in the last couple of months. Amidst this chatter, an aspect of India’s success over the last decade or so - the opening has been a bit neglected. Yes the middle order deserves all the flak and resurrection in that department should be executed with priority but you cannot overlook the constant failure of the openers to deliver what is expected of them. Sehwag & Gambhir has been India’s best opening combine in terms of runs and also the longest serving duo. When you have the same pair at the top, you either don’t have too many options or they are doing too well to disturb; 23 opening stands of 50 or more & 10 stands of 100+ out of 76 outings is a reasonable stat and should endorse the latter view. Dissect that stat a bit and a few creepy things crop up. The duo has managed to provide an opening stand of 100 or more only on 3 occasions out of 34 times they have gone out to open the batting on ...
2 comments
Read more

Should Cricket Embrace The 5 Rings?

Another glorious edition of the Olympics goes into the sunset. A couple of weeks that showcased the best athletes compete for the ultimate glory, an event that exhibited disappointment, defeat, joy, pride, victory, glory and a portrait that had participation from 204 nations! A rich history, a massive platform, unparalleled glory and probably the biggest show sports can offer, makes an Olympic Games edition stand out. Ardent cricket fans/followers would feel left out from this marquee sports event. Unlike Motorsports, Cricket is a recognized by the International Olympic Committee. Though cricket wasn’t an outright success in multi-sport models previously, times have changed and today cricket has its T20 avatar to offer for such events. The ICC has 105 countries as its recognized members, spanning continents and covering most of the globe.
2 comments
Read more