Skip to main content

Should Cricket Embrace The 5 Rings?


Another glorious edition of the Olympics goes into the sunset. A couple of weeks that showcased the best athletes compete for the ultimate glory, an event that exhibited disappointment, defeat, joy, pride, victory, glory and a portrait that had participation from 204 nations! A rich history, a massive platform, unparalleled glory and probably the biggest show sports can offer, makes an Olympic Games edition stand out.

Ardent cricket fans/followers would feel left out from this marquee sports event. Unlike Motorsports, Cricket is a recognized by the International Olympic Committee. Though cricket wasn’t an outright success in multi-sport models previously, times have changed and today cricket has its T20 avatar to offer for such events. The ICC has 105 countries as its recognized members, spanning continents and covering most of the globe.

So what is keeping the ICC and its member bodies from applying itself for the Summer Olympics? About a decade ago this would have been a valid question to pose, with issues of longevity of cricket matches, participation, logistics, maintenance of pitches but today most of them have an answer in T20 cricket. England, West Indies, Sri Lanka (important ICC members) have their home seasons during the period when the Summer Olympics are held; yet two weeks off that schedule once in 4 years shouldn’t really be a big problem. Another objection to that proposal is that very few nations play cricket. During London 2012, Football (men) had 16 teams & Hockey (men) saw 12 teams compete for the podium. The World T20 has 16 teams in the fray and a few of them pick themselves from the competitions for associate & affiliate members. Through World Cricket League (ICC’s endeavor to improve the participation of associate & affiliate members) the game is gradually spreading with today about 40 such nations participating regularly. Yes cricket is not competitive at all its levels, but things can change if they are allowed to.

Another argument that goes in refraining cricket from aligning to the Games of the Olympiad is that Olympics stand as the height of glory, the summit of competition across most of its disciplines. Cricket has a 50-over & a T20 World Cup and a test championship in the pipeline. Draw parallels to other sports at the Olympics: Football - surely the Olympics isn’t the biggest show the sport has to offer, Tennis - Federer would probably cherish his Wimbledon trophy more than he would rue his gold medal, and you could add a few other sports as well. In terms of cricket the Olympics could serve the pinnacle for T20 cricket, with the World T20 being scrapped. Instead of having windows in the FTP (Future Tours Program) for Champions League T20 having one for the Olympics could serve more purpose. Recent history will infer that the T20 format works well when it has more than 2 teams in the fray; be it the World T20 or domestic leagues, as compared to ODI or test cricket.

A successful company has all its managers delivering what they are expected to - the Production and Quality in-charges ensuring repute and ironing out flaws, while the Marketing heads making sure that the balance sheets record a green report! Cricket needs a bit of that; it has had & continues to have minute scrutiny about the game, modifying certain aspects, amend archaic rules but it needs more of the latter part. Any general sports follower in say India or Sri Lanka would say that he likes to see sporting disciplines at the Olympics which he has never seen/heard of; similar could be true for cricket and countries like USA, Germany, and Russia etc. 

Cricket could stumble upon during its initial phase at the summer games - could face challenge of fan following, ensuring cut-throat competition at all stages, maybe of under-cooked cricket tracks (the 2020 Olympics could be held at either Istanbul, Madrid or Tokyo) and a few others, but in the long run it could be the fillip that could propel cricket as a truly global sport. Before working towards a solution, the administrators should ask themselves honestly - does Cricket need Olympics or do the Olympics need Cricket? Ex-players, a few members from the cricket fraternity are pressing for the inclusion of Cricket in the 2020 edition; could a moment for poetic symmetry. You will continue to hear opposing voices or those of criticism, but the larger picture suggests Cricket has everything to play for in the Olympics!

Comments

  1. Great insights coupled with effective writing!
    Keep going.. :D

    ReplyDelete
  2. I could not resist commenting. Exceptionally well written!
    My web page: Aruba

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Save White From Melanization!

Like routine sets in, the debate and discussion encircling the IPL has become almost an invariant exercise. 5 seasons since its advent the critics don’t believe the IPL has or can do any good for Indian cricket, leave alone world cricket, cynics highlight all the off-field controversies associated with the event to drive home the point that the IPL is not cricket but merely entertainment and you have others who are either fans or admirers of the IPL, who don’t budge to the above views! Where have the discussions on the relevance of IPL to T20 cricket or of IPL stints as a stage to perform big taken all of us? The fact of the matter remains that neither the organizers nor anybody else is sure what purpose does the IPL serve. The ‘anybody’ referred to is indicative and is meant to bracket the section of people who don’t quite associate with the IPL.
There is stark similarity to the way the BCCI operates and the ICC is operating on the issue of IPL (undoubtedly a fall-out of Mr Pawar cha…

The Captaincy Conundrum!

8 teams, 60 matches and 7 ‘Indian’ skippers (discounting Duminy and Miller) constituted the recently concluded 9th edition of the Indian Premier League. This featured 2 new teams, unfamiliar captains (Raina, Vijay), seasoned IPL leaders (Gambhir, Rohit, Dhoni), a motivational veteran (Zaheer Khan) and Indian cricket’s man of the moment - Virat Kohli captaining a powerful side. Right through pre-tournament previews till the beginning of the finals, Sunrisers Hyderabad (SRH) wasn’t the most fancied team in the competition. The team was led by the only non-Indian skipper - David Warner, who didn’t have any prior experience of leading Australia. The middle order appeared fragile and injuries to experienced Indian international players (Nehra and Yuvraj) added to the perceptual woes.
Quietly and probably facilitated by the lack of attention, SRH managed to string in consistent wins and stay in the hunt for the title. The template of SRH was designed to ensure penetration with the new ball …

Dhoni's Time Is Up, But Whose Time Has Arrived?

Human tendency preserves memories by associating them with easily recognizable signals. Cricket by virtue of its inherent nature furnishes numerical statistics for this function. The two-test series in New Zealand may not be introspected with fond moments, but the bottom-line generated in the process has imparted a deep imprint on the timeline of Indian cricket. The Indian team and MS Dhoni in particular, now formally possess a dubious statistical feat - 4 consecutive away tours losses and the worst record for an Indian skipper in this context. Apart from getting into a sluggish pit of defeats away from home, the longevity and its consistency is now inducing emotions and retrospection from a critical aperture of the microscope. Naturally such a phase is succeeded by the exercise of identifying a scapegoat, and in the current case Dhoni is the face of all ills.
The primary objection to Dhoni's leadership is his perceivable inactive demeanor on the field. Real-time illustrations endo…