Skip to main content

Do We Really Need India vs Pakistan Right Now?


India is slated to resume international cricket after a break of almost two months; the longest since the advent of the IPL. Just as this break is about to complete, the BCCI has hinted at hosting Pakistan during the 2.5 week break during late December-early January. There have been spontaneous responses to that announcement; a mixed bag comprising of those who believe that 26/11 should be the roadblock for such a series and others who feel such a series can resume the ‘politically’ estranged ties between the two nations.

There are couple of dimensions to this entire story and only a few have highlighted vociferously thus far. Firstly let us delineate this whole business of ‘cricket diplomacy’. If cricket indeed was the sole reason for fostering cold relations, then each and every match between India and Pakistan during the last decade or so should have made it even more affectionate. India and Pakistan have featured quite a number of times in the last decade, yet every outing is treated as a fresh start. Cricket can indeed get people across borders together, enjoy sport with healthy competition, foster personal relations but it cannot get political ties to improve. The word cricket diplomacy is too foxy to fall prey to; for it can make attractive headlines, get people discussing about it but not serve much purpose practically.

Let us move to the cricketing aspect of the story. While India has a busy schedule, Pakistan doesn't have anything on its itinerary after the T20 WC (September). It makes sense for the PCB to push for such a series; as it serves dual purpose, resumes bilateral cricketing ties with India and also helps the board generate some revenue. But what explains BCCI’s stance? India has to host Australia straight after the England ODIs and then there is the IPL. Either the board believes that such a series won’t hamper player fitness & affect momentum or the board is too interested with cashing in on every possible revenue generation option.

India vs Pakistan was, is and will always remain a ‘marquee’ contest. Trimming it down to such a small series serves no cricketing purpose. Each and every contest has its features and India vs Pakistan is beyond what transpires on the cricket field. While it makes sense to entertain thoughts on resuming ties, the timing and the length of the proposed tour is beyond logic. India vs Pakistan may not be the ‘watch-out-for’ contest in test cricket, but surely it is one of the most followed one; yet you don’t have any test matches on the agenda! Fans on both sides would rather wait for a long, complete tour than be content with this mini-nothing.

India vs Pakistan is never short on the emotional quotient; and the prospective tour too doesn’t deviate from that fact. While a few notable people have opposed this tour on the basic of too-much-cricket, there are few who object this on the basis of the 26/11 attacks. Both the arguments hold significance and if the proposed tour does indeed move ahead, the opposition is likely to grow. The two boards could have proposed a neutral venue to organize this or could have planned a full tour next year, instead what has transpired is unnecessary and avoidable confusion. If the tour eventually materializes you could expect fortress like stadiums, political slingshots, emotional retaliation/opposition from a few people/organizations and much more.

India has two intense back-to-back home tours (versus England and Australia) which could be more than mentally tiring for the players. Squeeze in this highly emotional and pressure series and there is no respite for the players. Pakistan has an important and a long tour to South Africa. The players would rather prefer a few weeks to acclimatize there rather than contest almost a nothing series. Picture this for the Indian fans - non-stop cricket from the 1st ODI in SL; a prospect long enough to creep in the bore factor. With so many cons in sight do we seriously need this series?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Adieu Rahul Dravid

It could have been timed better, it could have come a little later, it could have been better celebrated but the retirement was always going to come some day. It is easier said than fathomed - the Indian test side without Dravid! The news on first instance was a moment of disbelief, followed by a moment of daze before logic struck saying that it had to come and the moment had indeed arrived. Dravid was never a glamorous character on or off the field, more of a thorough gentleman commanding respect from all quarters. His announcement was synonymous with his usual self - calm, composed, dignified and non-fussy. Dravid was, is and will always be remembered as a role model for his conduct, dignity, selflessness  on the cricket field & off it  along-with his technically impeccable batting. On the global scene the game has lost one of its modern-day great and an all-time legend. The clock was ticking for Dravid much before, but an exceptional tour of England postpone...
4 comments
Read more

India's problems begin from the top!

The middle order of India’s batting line-up has been the focus of all the criticism in the last couple of months. Amidst this chatter, an aspect of India’s success over the last decade or so - the opening has been a bit neglected. Yes the middle order deserves all the flak and resurrection in that department should be executed with priority but you cannot overlook the constant failure of the openers to deliver what is expected of them. Sehwag & Gambhir has been India’s best opening combine in terms of runs and also the longest serving duo. When you have the same pair at the top, you either don’t have too many options or they are doing too well to disturb; 23 opening stands of 50 or more & 10 stands of 100+ out of 76 outings is a reasonable stat and should endorse the latter view. Dissect that stat a bit and a few creepy things crop up. The duo has managed to provide an opening stand of 100 or more only on 3 occasions out of 34 times they have gone out to open the batting on ...
2 comments
Read more

Should Cricket Embrace The 5 Rings?

Another glorious edition of the Olympics goes into the sunset. A couple of weeks that showcased the best athletes compete for the ultimate glory, an event that exhibited disappointment, defeat, joy, pride, victory, glory and a portrait that had participation from 204 nations! A rich history, a massive platform, unparalleled glory and probably the biggest show sports can offer, makes an Olympic Games edition stand out. Ardent cricket fans/followers would feel left out from this marquee sports event. Unlike Motorsports, Cricket is a recognized by the International Olympic Committee. Though cricket wasn’t an outright success in multi-sport models previously, times have changed and today cricket has its T20 avatar to offer for such events. The ICC has 105 countries as its recognized members, spanning continents and covering most of the globe.
2 comments
Read more