Skip to main content

Space Out Domestic Leagues & Scrap CLT20!

The Champions League is around and like a routine there is debate and discussion around the tournament’s relevance and/or its structure and/or its format. The league in principle is rosy - providing a stage for lesser known club players and sides, but in the context of taking it to the level of say, a T20 World Cup, it appears woefully below that; both in terms of following/interest and level of competition. While there is a barrage of question marks on the existence of the tournament, here is an account to suggest a way to optimize the output from T20 cricket in general.

T20 cricket (in most countries) has four distinct ways of presentation - a domestic league (aka IPL), Champions League T20 (CLT20), international matches (during tours) & the World Championship. The way T20 cricket has emerged, each of the above entity is promoted like a gala event. But do we seriously need so much of T20 cricket? Picture this for an average Indian fan in 2012 - 6-7 weeks of the IPL, 2 T20Is versus New Zealand, 2 weeks of T20 WC and two weeks of CLT20; the consequence - very few aware that CLT20 2012 has actually begun! They said that T20 is a lucrative product and could face the issue of killing the goose; 6-7 years since it was introduced the fear is realizing.

Is there a way to keep the investors, stakeholders, spectators, players and the boards all happy simultaneously? - A clear no; but there could always be the mean path. The IPL & CLT20 were designed on their football counterparts in terms of structure but not in terms of tournament formatting. A huge reason why the EPL is so popular is because it provides an ‘exciting’ contest almost every week, keeping the anticipation factor intact and ensuring that the hype remains aloof over a period of time. T20 tournaments run over a few weeks and have the conventional structure of group stages and then the knock-outs.

Is there a case for T20 cricket to emulate the EPL in terms of formatting? International cricket cannot run like a league for that would require each team touring every other, every year! Champions League will have too many logistics issues; but IPL-like tournaments can do that. How can this be done? Here is an illustration: currently the IPL has 8 teams’ viz. 56 matches (home-away format); two matches per week and you reduce the tournament to 6 months. Matches could complement the home season, say one game between two test matches/ODI matches from September/October right upto February. In case of away tours during that period, the lost time could be compensated in April/May. For instance if a test match is scheduled to begin at Chennai, CSK could play one of its home games a few days before that.

This way the fans are kept engaged over a period of time, the tournament remains popular and things like too much cricket during the off-season (April-May) can be avoided. This could be the league point of view, but does that complement what international cricket would think? The issues with this thought are - we can’t have international players travelling for one week for a game or so, international players can’t be asked to switch on & off between important test matches. Security and ground maintenance could some secondary issues. But if there is some will, these issues have answers - typically IPL squads are 30-membered units and test matches could be spaced out more than merely 3 days. This structure could be emulated for other boards/countries as well, which allows club sides get to play on the backdrop of decent on-field/off-field buzz.

How does this help the entire scenario of T20 cricket? This could test the viability of IPL-like tournaments and reduce the stress on the club vs country debate. Domestic players are tested over a period of time, chances of boredom due to too many T20s at a time is reduced which could mean lesser low-attended games and decent TRPs. T20Is & World T20 stay where they are but that leaves no room for Champions League T20. Fair enough! Reasons follow. CLT20 struggles with context and neutral match scenario. Club sides deserve the stage, but it would only be worth if they have decent following. We can’t blame the spectators either, why would locals in South Africa/India overwhelmingly throng to watch say Sialkot Stallions versus Auckland Aces? The context issue has a huge relevance to CLT20 following. DD without Sehwag would still draw decent crowds at Ferozshah Kotla but would be tough to expect a similar response at say Durban or Jo’burg; which incidentally a Sehwag-less Indian side would still generate. It is not the most ideal moment (at the beginning of CLT20 2012) to present this perspective, but in the larger interest deeper thoughts need to go into this subject.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Save White From Melanization!

Like routine sets in, the debate and discussion encircling the IPL has become almost an invariant exercise. 5 seasons since its advent the critics don’t believe the IPL has or can do any good for Indian cricket, leave alone world cricket, cynics highlight all the off-field controversies associated with the event to drive home the point that the IPL is not cricket but merely entertainment and you have others who are either fans or admirers of the IPL, who don’t budge to the above views! Where have the discussions on the relevance of IPL to T20 cricket or of IPL stints as a stage to perform big taken all of us? The fact of the matter remains that neither the organizers nor anybody else is sure what purpose does the IPL serve. The ‘anybody’ referred to is indicative and is meant to bracket the section of people who don’t quite associate with the IPL.
There is stark similarity to the way the BCCI operates and the ICC is operating on the issue of IPL (undoubtedly a fall-out of Mr Pawar cha…

The Captaincy Conundrum!

8 teams, 60 matches and 7 ‘Indian’ skippers (discounting Duminy and Miller) constituted the recently concluded 9th edition of the Indian Premier League. This featured 2 new teams, unfamiliar captains (Raina, Vijay), seasoned IPL leaders (Gambhir, Rohit, Dhoni), a motivational veteran (Zaheer Khan) and Indian cricket’s man of the moment - Virat Kohli captaining a powerful side. Right through pre-tournament previews till the beginning of the finals, Sunrisers Hyderabad (SRH) wasn’t the most fancied team in the competition. The team was led by the only non-Indian skipper - David Warner, who didn’t have any prior experience of leading Australia. The middle order appeared fragile and injuries to experienced Indian international players (Nehra and Yuvraj) added to the perceptual woes.
Quietly and probably facilitated by the lack of attention, SRH managed to string in consistent wins and stay in the hunt for the title. The template of SRH was designed to ensure penetration with the new ball …

Dhoni's Time Is Up, But Whose Time Has Arrived?

Human tendency preserves memories by associating them with easily recognizable signals. Cricket by virtue of its inherent nature furnishes numerical statistics for this function. The two-test series in New Zealand may not be introspected with fond moments, but the bottom-line generated in the process has imparted a deep imprint on the timeline of Indian cricket. The Indian team and MS Dhoni in particular, now formally possess a dubious statistical feat - 4 consecutive away tours losses and the worst record for an Indian skipper in this context. Apart from getting into a sluggish pit of defeats away from home, the longevity and its consistency is now inducing emotions and retrospection from a critical aperture of the microscope. Naturally such a phase is succeeded by the exercise of identifying a scapegoat, and in the current case Dhoni is the face of all ills.
The primary objection to Dhoni's leadership is his perceivable inactive demeanor on the field. Real-time illustrations endo…