Skip to main content

Cummins Promises A 'Colorful' Future!


Second semi-final, Gayle & Samuels trying to set up a big total. The score reads 53 for 1 after 7. Bailey hands over the ball to Cummins to bowl the 8th over. First ball - full and boom! In the arc for Samuels to smack it to the advertisement boards behind the extra cover fielder for a four. With a couple of sixes preceding this over, Samuels is in the mood to butcher anything in his arc. Second delivery - takes almost a decade to reach the other end, Samuels goes for the big slog, misses and timber! A moment of sudden stoppage for a vehicle traveling on an expressway! The remaining 4 deliveries are alternate full, quick and genuine slow deliveries short of length; just six runs off that over. Zoom out; in the context of the 205 for 4 total that WI amassed, that over didn't count much.

16th over of the game against India, Cummins has Dhoni & Raina to contain. Australia hasn't let India gain any momentum until then. Short of length to Raina for a single first up, quick length dot delivery next; follows the risky slow bouncer which is cut in the deep for just two. Two deliveries quick and good areas imply two dot balls. Just 3 runs of 5 deliveries in the 16th! The last delivery could have been a replica of previous ones, instead a wide, sucker ball to draw Dhoni to play the false shot and he holds out to Bailey at extra cover. The momentum remains with Australia and the over delivers a bonus in Dhoni’s wicket. At the end of the day, that over doesn't stand out as Australia eased to a 9-wicket win.

There are two ways to judge young, budding players - one is to scan and analyze match score sheets or observe how that person responds to questions that situations ask! The above two illustrations of isolation speak a few things about Patrick Cummins’ qualities as a pace bowler. He is genuinely quick, period, but a couple of moments in this tournament reflect why his peers and colleagues rate him so high. The Samuels dismissal and the death over against India suggest that he can devise a real-time plan and execute it efficiently. Australian bowling attacks in the past were impeccable for they didn't allow you to get away once they had the batsmen under control; Cummins appears in shades of that culture.

Genuine pace bowlers have a few common attribute - aggressive, always at you, love to ruffle a batsman’s feathers, believe that a boundary ball should be followed by a quicker delivery! We have seen Cummins’ burst in test & ODI cricket, but for many this was the first instance of watching this hyped-talent in T20 cricket. He can be relentless and paceman-like in the longer formats, but for the shortest format he appears to be of the Brett Lee mould - using variations of length and pace, rather than of the Shane Tait one - eternal pace, you-miss-I-hit.

Call it pre-match planning or resistant leadership, but Cummins for the major part of the competition wasn't allowed to bowl two consecutive overs! 6 wickets in 6 innings at 8.20 RPO aren't numbers or performances that make it to highlights packages or dream teams of the tournament, but in the overall setup of the Australian attack, Cummins had an effective role. His stats are a reflection of the period in the innings he came in to bowl - first or second change bowler most often, bowling an over within the power-play and one just after it; his last two were kept for the death. 

We don’t know what the team management has plans for Cummins and despite his okay-ish show in Sri Lanka, there would be many who would not want to see him burdened with limited-overs assignment. He has the test-cricket outlook to him, and the smartness for one-over spells. Couple an injury-prone body to that and it would be better proposition for him to stick to one, or at most two formats for effective usage of his skills & ability in the long term; plausibly test & T20 cricket. Cummins hasn't emerged as the find or the star of the tournament, but his 24 overs promise a bright prospect!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should Cricket Embrace The 5 Rings?

Another glorious edition of the Olympics goes into the sunset. A couple of weeks that showcased the best athletes compete for the ultimate glory, an event that exhibited disappointment, defeat, joy, pride, victory, glory and a portrait that had participation from 204 nations! A rich history, a massive platform, unparalleled glory and probably the biggest show sports can offer, makes an Olympic Games edition stand out. Ardent cricket fans/followers would feel left out from this marquee sports event. Unlike Motorsports, Cricket is a recognized by the International Olympic Committee. Though cricket wasn’t an outright success in multi-sport models previously, times have changed and today cricket has its T20 avatar to offer for such events. The ICC has 105 countries as its recognized members, spanning continents and covering most of the globe.

Adieu Rahul Dravid

It could have been timed better, it could have come a little later, it could have been better celebrated but the retirement was always going to come some day. It is easier said than fathomed - the Indian test side without Dravid! The news on first instance was a moment of disbelief, followed by a moment of daze before logic struck saying that it had to come and the moment had indeed arrived. Dravid was never a glamorous character on or off the field, more of a thorough gentleman commanding respect from all quarters. His announcement was synonymous with his usual self - calm, composed, dignified and non-fussy. Dravid was, is and will always be remembered as a role model for his conduct, dignity, selflessness  on the cricket field & off it  along-with his technically impeccable batting. On the global scene the game has lost one of its modern-day great and an all-time legend. The clock was ticking for Dravid much before, but an exceptional tour of England postponed this event (

India's problems begin from the top!

The middle order of India’s batting line-up has been the focus of all the criticism in the last couple of months. Amidst this chatter, an aspect of India’s success over the last decade or so - the opening has been a bit neglected. Yes the middle order deserves all the flak and resurrection in that department should be executed with priority but you cannot overlook the constant failure of the openers to deliver what is expected of them. Sehwag & Gambhir has been India’s best opening combine in terms of runs and also the longest serving duo. When you have the same pair at the top, you either don’t have too many options or they are doing too well to disturb; 23 opening stands of 50 or more & 10 stands of 100+ out of 76 outings is a reasonable stat and should endorse the latter view. Dissect that stat a bit and a few creepy things crop up. The duo has managed to provide an opening stand of 100 or more only on 3 occasions out of 34 times they have gone out to open the batting on