Skip to main content

Recipe For #1!

Cricket has evolved and so has the attention to performances in it. While the colored version of cricket has a World Cup to adjudge a champion, test cricket continues to recognize the best ‘current’ side via rating points. Today the position in the rankings table has a lot of relevance - reaching the pedestal today has a priority mark in the coaches’ to-do list, players pride on reaching the summit and seasonal fans keep a close tab on other sides as well! It has brought excitement, relevance to performances and a stock-market like buzz to test cricket. Like the crude oil prices, the test cricket pedestal has seen constant fluctuation in the recent past; in the last 5 years the position has had a different recipient 4 times! This is modern-day test cricket - one good season can push you up the ladder and a no clear outright world-beater. Dilution of home advantage or away disadvantage with constant tours or change in the quality of pitches or change in the attitude of players could be the reasons for this but closer observation reveals it has got a lot to do with the structure and outline of the playing elevens!

There is a definitive outline to the way number one ranked teams are built and the position is sustained. From observations for the last few seasons, here are the bare essentials - a left-handed opener, a rock solid number 3, an in-form number 4, 2 fast bowlers & a decent spinner. This could be just a mere coincidence but somehow sides with a left-handed opener have done better; Langer, Smith, Strauss, Gambhir have opened the batting for the number one ranked side. It could be attributed to left-right combination (e.g. Gambhir-Sehwag, Smith-Peterson) or complementing the flamboyant partner (e.g. Langer-Hayden) or something else, but today a left-handed opener is an indispensible component of a test team.

We all know what a number 3 batsman means to a test side, and Ponting, Amla, Dravid, Trott have underlined all those facets. Zoom in a bit and you will find that the form of your number 3 is directly proportional to the performance of the team. You may have a good opening combine, a pivotal number 3 but it doesn’t work well unless you have a run-scoring number 4, who should probably be the best batsman in your line-up! Hussey, Kallis, Tendulkar, Pietersen form the set of players who have converted a foundation into something substantial often during the period the respective teams were conceiving the numero uno dream.

Test matches are never won by batsmen alone; you have to bowl the opposition out twice! All good test sides have had a minimum of 2 quality/in-form bowlers of 2 kinds - one the seamer who is good with the new & old ball and another who is tall, relatively quick, hit-the-deck kind of bowler. Clark, Hilfenhaus, Steyn, Zaheer, Anderson form the set of seamers, while Lee, Siddle, Morkel, Ishant, Broad belong the latter type. Add a decent spinner to back these quick’s and the end product is good enough! Australia struggled to find a replacement to MacGill which made them a lesser penetrative side in the sub-continent. Harbhajan, Swann propelled the respective sides, by being a resourceful back-up option for the skipper, both in terms of containment & as the wicket taker.

Apart from these bare essentials, there are the important members of a test XI whose performances often dictates whether you are the best or the second best! The second opener, the number 5 & 6, the wicket keeper and the first change bowler belong to this category of players. Instances like 100 from the keeper from the side or a spell of 4-5 wickets from the first change bowler and the frequency to such events is often the parameter to distinguish teams. All good sides in the recent past have tinkered around with the number 6 player (like fluxing in a youngster), but have stuck with an experienced number 5 (e.g. Clarke-North, Devilliers-Duminy, Laxman-Yuvraj, Bell-Morgan), one who has the ability to bat with the tail and can customize his game to score quick runs when needed. Gilchrist laid the benchmark for wicketkeepers in terms of batting in modern times; Boucher, Haddin, Dhoni and Prior have traced a similar path.

It is intriguing to find such similarities in the way all recent number one ranked test sides have been built upon. Captaincy and coaching are an integral part of success but often a catalyst in the process and the not the sole reason for the outcome, but stability in that department helps the cause. Modern day test cricket provides the space for teams to take time and build a team, as your competing sides aren’t too far ahead. The similarities in the structure of successful test teams could act as a template for lower ranked sides and help them identify the missing pieces in the puzzle. It is a lot easier said and penned down but very difficult to materialize ideas, plans and have the individuals execute their roles consistently; perhaps that is the difference between number one ranked sides and the fringe teams! 


Popular posts from this blog

Save White From Melanization!

Like routine sets in, the debate and discussion encircling the IPL has become almost an invariant exercise. 5 seasons since its advent the critics don’t believe the IPL has or can do any good for Indian cricket, leave alone world cricket, cynics highlight all the off-field controversies associated with the event to drive home the point that the IPL is not cricket but merely entertainment and you have others who are either fans or admirers of the IPL, who don’t budge to the above views! Where have the discussions on the relevance of IPL to T20 cricket or of IPL stints as a stage to perform big taken all of us? The fact of the matter remains that neither the organizers nor anybody else is sure what purpose does the IPL serve. The ‘anybody’ referred to is indicative and is meant to bracket the section of people who don’t quite associate with the IPL.
There is stark similarity to the way the BCCI operates and the ICC is operating on the issue of IPL (undoubtedly a fall-out of Mr Pawar cha…

The Captaincy Conundrum!

8 teams, 60 matches and 7 ‘Indian’ skippers (discounting Duminy and Miller) constituted the recently concluded 9th edition of the Indian Premier League. This featured 2 new teams, unfamiliar captains (Raina, Vijay), seasoned IPL leaders (Gambhir, Rohit, Dhoni), a motivational veteran (Zaheer Khan) and Indian cricket’s man of the moment - Virat Kohli captaining a powerful side. Right through pre-tournament previews till the beginning of the finals, Sunrisers Hyderabad (SRH) wasn’t the most fancied team in the competition. The team was led by the only non-Indian skipper - David Warner, who didn’t have any prior experience of leading Australia. The middle order appeared fragile and injuries to experienced Indian international players (Nehra and Yuvraj) added to the perceptual woes.
Quietly and probably facilitated by the lack of attention, SRH managed to string in consistent wins and stay in the hunt for the title. The template of SRH was designed to ensure penetration with the new ball …

Dhoni's Time Is Up, But Whose Time Has Arrived?

Human tendency preserves memories by associating them with easily recognizable signals. Cricket by virtue of its inherent nature furnishes numerical statistics for this function. The two-test series in New Zealand may not be introspected with fond moments, but the bottom-line generated in the process has imparted a deep imprint on the timeline of Indian cricket. The Indian team and MS Dhoni in particular, now formally possess a dubious statistical feat - 4 consecutive away tours losses and the worst record for an Indian skipper in this context. Apart from getting into a sluggish pit of defeats away from home, the longevity and its consistency is now inducing emotions and retrospection from a critical aperture of the microscope. Naturally such a phase is succeeded by the exercise of identifying a scapegoat, and in the current case Dhoni is the face of all ills.
The primary objection to Dhoni's leadership is his perceivable inactive demeanor on the field. Real-time illustrations endo…