Skip to main content

ODI Cricket Dead? Not Yet!


Since the T20 format has come about many experts, analysts have been critical of the co-existence of all 3 formats of the game (came across a perspective from the meticulous CNN-IBN sports editor Gaurav Kalra which got me to present this counter view!). The critique in such observations does have evidence and practical issues to back it, but many of them tend to conclude on the exclusion of 50-over cricket at the international level, which I believe should be the last option.

The International Cricket Council (ICC) has been pretty clear on its stand of co-existence of all 3 formats; backing that stance by rejecting a window to the ‘domestic’ T20 league - IPL, forbidding a 7-match T20I series and through speculative reports suggesting every third 50-over World Cup could be hosted by the sub-continent!

The views that ODI cricket has been on a decline since the advent of T20 cricket are only partially true. ODI cricket has been struggling for a long while now; in fact T20 cricket was born out of the necessity to find a lucrative option to 50-over cricket both domestically and at the international level. The above point is made to indicate that the argument to get rid of ODI cricket has been on the assumption of T20 cricket being the future of cricket isn’t a flawless one. What if 10 years T20 cricket has sameness to it and test cricket continues to slide both in terms of popularity and quality? This could be misleading but the IPL trends suggest that T20 leagues may not necessarily be the future.

In today’s day and age everything has to be associated with marketing prospects and of quantum of off-field viewership. Marketing experts or media analysts could have the correct data on this, but you sense that 50-over World Cup generated more revenue and viewership than an IPL season or the T20 World Cup. Yes the 2011 World Cup had its reasons for it being popular, but the flagship tourney suggested that if the context is conducive, 50-over cricket can still co-exist.

As an Indian cricket fan do you savor the 2007 win Jo’burg more than the night on 2nd April 2011? Can you name outstanding individual performances in T20Is after the successful win in 2007? Do you remember Sachin’s hundred in the IPL more than his ODI ton in say Sydney (2008) or Colombo (2009)? IPL-5 had 20+ last over finishes; can you name more than 5 of them? They say that T20 is fast, but so is the longevity of the memories associated with it. Longer the format sweeter the victory and this logic sustains for all the 3 formats.

50-over cricket hasn’t suffered from the popularity of T20 cricket but from lack of reforms in terms of scheduling and organization and too many tinkering of rules. 2004-05 was a period when the ICC felt that ODI cricket wasn’t doing well, so instead of finding ways to restore its popularity, they modified rules. Fast forward the years and you will find, that the administrators have felt that tinkering of rules is the only way to uplift ODI cricket. Reduction in number of matches in a year or reduction in number of matches in a bilateral series, or doing away with pointless series or scrapping the meaningless Champions Trophy haven’t been on the agenda.

The proposal of having only Test & T20 cricket could appear logical for certain reasons, but do you have players to adapt to either formats? Ponting, Clarke, Dravid, Tendulkar recognized that T20 cricket wasn’t their kind of cricket, not in the sense of skills and temperament but in terms of quality of competition. Shorter the format more the level playing field for competing teams. West Indies vs India could churn out a close T20 match but one-sided boring ODI & test matches. On the other hand Australia vs India provide exciting, anticipative Test & ODI matches but not necessarily tough T20 matches. The key to sustain ODI cricket is in identifying context and relevance of the format to the competing teams.

Cricket has the problem of plenty (of formats), and is struggling to have everybody happy at the moment. Ex-players, cricket analysts and media experts have suggested at abolishing ODI cricket. The thought to advocate for existence of ODI cricket may not be a representative view, but a spectator’s view nonetheless! ODI cricket may not be the crowd puller any more, it may not command the same interest as it used to, but through to good planning and management efforts should go in to sustain the format.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Save White From Melanization!

Like routine sets in, the debate and discussion encircling the IPL has become almost an invariant exercise. 5 seasons since its advent the critics don’t believe the IPL has or can do any good for Indian cricket, leave alone world cricket, cynics highlight all the off-field controversies associated with the event to drive home the point that the IPL is not cricket but merely entertainment and you have others who are either fans or admirers of the IPL, who don’t budge to the above views! Where have the discussions on the relevance of IPL to T20 cricket or of IPL stints as a stage to perform big taken all of us? The fact of the matter remains that neither the organizers nor anybody else is sure what purpose does the IPL serve. The ‘anybody’ referred to is indicative and is meant to bracket the section of people who don’t quite associate with the IPL.
There is stark similarity to the way the BCCI operates and the ICC is operating on the issue of IPL (undoubtedly a fall-out of Mr Pawar cha…

The Captaincy Conundrum!

8 teams, 60 matches and 7 ‘Indian’ skippers (discounting Duminy and Miller) constituted the recently concluded 9th edition of the Indian Premier League. This featured 2 new teams, unfamiliar captains (Raina, Vijay), seasoned IPL leaders (Gambhir, Rohit, Dhoni), a motivational veteran (Zaheer Khan) and Indian cricket’s man of the moment - Virat Kohli captaining a powerful side. Right through pre-tournament previews till the beginning of the finals, Sunrisers Hyderabad (SRH) wasn’t the most fancied team in the competition. The team was led by the only non-Indian skipper - David Warner, who didn’t have any prior experience of leading Australia. The middle order appeared fragile and injuries to experienced Indian international players (Nehra and Yuvraj) added to the perceptual woes.
Quietly and probably facilitated by the lack of attention, SRH managed to string in consistent wins and stay in the hunt for the title. The template of SRH was designed to ensure penetration with the new ball …

Dhoni's Time Is Up, But Whose Time Has Arrived?

Human tendency preserves memories by associating them with easily recognizable signals. Cricket by virtue of its inherent nature furnishes numerical statistics for this function. The two-test series in New Zealand may not be introspected with fond moments, but the bottom-line generated in the process has imparted a deep imprint on the timeline of Indian cricket. The Indian team and MS Dhoni in particular, now formally possess a dubious statistical feat - 4 consecutive away tours losses and the worst record for an Indian skipper in this context. Apart from getting into a sluggish pit of defeats away from home, the longevity and its consistency is now inducing emotions and retrospection from a critical aperture of the microscope. Naturally such a phase is succeeded by the exercise of identifying a scapegoat, and in the current case Dhoni is the face of all ills.
The primary objection to Dhoni's leadership is his perceivable inactive demeanor on the field. Real-time illustrations endo…