Skip to main content

How good is the IPL as a TV product?


‘.. and it’s time for the Strategic time-out’, the commentator says to reappear or more appropriately to be reheard about 5 seconds short of 2.5 minutes, counting down those last few seconds on the ticker. In between we have all the brands who have affiliated with the IPL promote their products. Cricket is probably the only sport which gives such live airtime to its advertisers, and probably the reason why the broadcaster attempts at providing all possible time space to its investors. Nothing wrong with the advertiser or the broadcaster for each entity is trying to maximize its potential gains.

During the current season we now have had two outstanding high-scoring ‘afternoon’ games, involving teams chase down big totals (CSK vs RCB & RR vs DC), followed by the 2nd game of that day. In between the broadcaster manages to squeeze only the post-match presentation and 2-3 minutes of packaged highlights; for a TV viewer this is too short a time to recreate the match that has transpired. In general, more often than not we end up watching highlights of an outstanding innings, a tight game, or a brilliant bowling spell again and again. IPL matches or the contents in it aren’t provided the space to allow the viewer to ruminate whatever he has seen.

Undoubtedly the IPL is more of a commercial product using the glamorous avatar of the game, but we ought to look at it from the perspective of it being a prime-time event. Those who advocate for the IPL will always cite the genre of viewership it gets on TV. The time slots (prime-time) are designed to accommodate those who struggle to follow ODI cricket or test matches during day times. Families go out to the stadiums to cheer for their favorite sides; while a few others enjoy the 3 & something hours of ‘cricketainment’ over dinner! To maintain simplicity the broadcaster has traditionally roped in VJs to anchor mid-innings, conduct pre and post match analysis and reports; probably because that helps the ‘non-ardent’ cricket followers connect to what is going on.

TV ratings were the talking point of the IPL after the first week. The ratings are down and experts will debate over the possible reasons. Despite of those shabby numbers, the IPL as a cricket product is still good enough, even if you compare it with successful TV soaps or weekend events. IPL as a TV product will have lots of questions to ponder upon for the ratings aren’t growing. The 4th edition had a valid reason to back the resultant ratings; season 5 will struggle to provide reasons unless the ratings improve. Like it should be, the focus was shifted from glossy bollywood performances during the opening night to performances on the field. Good televised packaging leads to higher viewership, similarly you wouldn’t want to watch what you don’t quite like. Move around IPL viewers and you may find a section of people who likes to watch live cricket but follow pre & reviews somewhere else for he doesn’t get what he likes to watch - contemplate on the action that he has witnessed. The problem with multi-genre viewership is to target the group which has the majority and cater accordingly. The IPL has such a diverse fan base that the organizers and broadcasters won’t have an easy task identifying the reasons for the drop in its TV ratings; but they will have to, for the IPL is primarily a TV product!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Save White From Melanization!

Like routine sets in, the debate and discussion encircling the IPL has become almost an invariant exercise. 5 seasons since its advent the critics don’t believe the IPL has or can do any good for Indian cricket, leave alone world cricket, cynics highlight all the off-field controversies associated with the event to drive home the point that the IPL is not cricket but merely entertainment and you have others who are either fans or admirers of the IPL, who don’t budge to the above views! Where have the discussions on the relevance of IPL to T20 cricket or of IPL stints as a stage to perform big taken all of us? The fact of the matter remains that neither the organizers nor anybody else is sure what purpose does the IPL serve. The ‘anybody’ referred to is indicative and is meant to bracket the section of people who don’t quite associate with the IPL.
There is stark similarity to the way the BCCI operates and the ICC is operating on the issue of IPL (undoubtedly a fall-out of Mr Pawar cha…

The Captaincy Conundrum!

8 teams, 60 matches and 7 ‘Indian’ skippers (discounting Duminy and Miller) constituted the recently concluded 9th edition of the Indian Premier League. This featured 2 new teams, unfamiliar captains (Raina, Vijay), seasoned IPL leaders (Gambhir, Rohit, Dhoni), a motivational veteran (Zaheer Khan) and Indian cricket’s man of the moment - Virat Kohli captaining a powerful side. Right through pre-tournament previews till the beginning of the finals, Sunrisers Hyderabad (SRH) wasn’t the most fancied team in the competition. The team was led by the only non-Indian skipper - David Warner, who didn’t have any prior experience of leading Australia. The middle order appeared fragile and injuries to experienced Indian international players (Nehra and Yuvraj) added to the perceptual woes.
Quietly and probably facilitated by the lack of attention, SRH managed to string in consistent wins and stay in the hunt for the title. The template of SRH was designed to ensure penetration with the new ball …

Dhoni's Time Is Up, But Whose Time Has Arrived?

Human tendency preserves memories by associating them with easily recognizable signals. Cricket by virtue of its inherent nature furnishes numerical statistics for this function. The two-test series in New Zealand may not be introspected with fond moments, but the bottom-line generated in the process has imparted a deep imprint on the timeline of Indian cricket. The Indian team and MS Dhoni in particular, now formally possess a dubious statistical feat - 4 consecutive away tours losses and the worst record for an Indian skipper in this context. Apart from getting into a sluggish pit of defeats away from home, the longevity and its consistency is now inducing emotions and retrospection from a critical aperture of the microscope. Naturally such a phase is succeeded by the exercise of identifying a scapegoat, and in the current case Dhoni is the face of all ills.
The primary objection to Dhoni's leadership is his perceivable inactive demeanor on the field. Real-time illustrations endo…