Skip to main content

ODI Cricket Has Some Life Left!

The 7th edition of the Champions Trophy, a success, the final match of the ODI tournament virtually being a T20 game, uncertainty over the tournament’s future, ICC annual meet and its decisions. Phew! The past week or two have left cricket followers and pundits with a horde of issues to ponder and discuss about. India will hold the Champions Trophy forever, in four years time we will have the inaugural Test Championship and the T20 world cup will now be an event with a 4-year cycle.

Perceptions can change quickly and the outlook about the Champions Trophy & the Test Championship has changed drastically over the last 5 years; from ridiculing the existence of the 8-nation ODI tourney to being apprehensive about the Test Championship. On-field action has been a prime reason to this perspective transition. With the World Cup already in place, the Champions Trophy was struggling to notch up USP features, both in terms of context and frequency. The discrepancy between the actual performances and the position on the rankings table for tests was shouting out for a better relative scale. With these decisions the ICC has shown first signs of tinkering with the way test cricket is contested and a few things about the vision of the governing body with respect to limited overs cricket.

There were judicious voices expressing redundancy of the 50-over format itself over the last 5-6 years. Two consecutive ICC events (2011 World Cup & 2013 Champions Trophy) have illustrated that the format is still good enough if context can marry scheduling. In order of preference the World Cup outweighs everything else but the Champions Trophy probably has the better formatting, not only in terms of length but also in terms of number of lopsided match-ups. Though this ideology keeps the associate teams out of the big stage and doesn’t aid the ultimate objective of the sport - to be recognized on the ‘global’ forum.

Is there a way which can achieve the essence of the pinnacle of a sport - excluding the disparity in the subset of an event, yet achieve its significance of crowning a world-beater? For a concentrated sport like cricket, inclusion of a couple of associate nations (picked via qualifying tournaments) during world cups has been the way thus far. The major concern with the waning bonding with ODI cricket is the numerous avoidable bilateral/triangular series. The test playing nations rarely play against non-test playing teams between two world cup editions.

Can we amalgamate the two discrete observations? The top 16-20 sides (full members plus associates combined) can be separated into two pools with equal distribution of test playing nations. Each team will play the remaining teams in the group between the 4 years of two world cups; in which India vs Australia can be a 5-match series and India vs Afghanistan can be a 2-match series. Each match will carry a value which adds up cumulatively till the succeeding world cup. Thus each and every match will have a context and each series can be an indirect step towards globalizing the sport with a greater frequency. The top 4/5 sides of each pool can then qualify for the main event which can have a condensed nature like the one for Champions Trophy. There will be issues with this structure, primarily those of logistics and broadcast/marketing as each match will invariably be an ICC qualifier contest. For a well connected world, travel & logistics can hardly be an excuse. The 4 year window shouldn’t hinder scheduling and time frames.


The 3 formats of the game are at completely different stages on the respective timelines, with each having its respective share of overhaul requirements. While the decision in favour of test championship should be welcomed, the 4 year cycle of T20 world cup is a tad ambiguous. To be fair ODI cricket is on the wrong side of its shelf life, but surely there is still some life left. The 50-over World Cup is cricket’s flagship event and there is no threat to its existence, atleast in the near future. The concern is about what happens between the 4 years of this marquee event. If not the above structure, there needs to be something else which can ensure that inconsequential-esque hordes of ODI series assume better adjectives than boring, cumbersome and unexciting!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Adieu Rahul Dravid

It could have been timed better, it could have come a little later, it could have been better celebrated but the retirement was always going to come some day. It is easier said than fathomed - the Indian test side without Dravid! The news on first instance was a moment of disbelief, followed by a moment of daze before logic struck saying that it had to come and the moment had indeed arrived. Dravid was never a glamorous character on or off the field, more of a thorough gentleman commanding respect from all quarters. His announcement was synonymous with his usual self - calm, composed, dignified and non-fussy. Dravid was, is and will always be remembered as a role model for his conduct, dignity, selflessness  on the cricket field & off it  along-with his technically impeccable batting. On the global scene the game has lost one of its modern-day great and an all-time legend. The clock was ticking for Dravid much before, but an exceptional tour of England postpone...
4 comments
Read more

India's problems begin from the top!

The middle order of India’s batting line-up has been the focus of all the criticism in the last couple of months. Amidst this chatter, an aspect of India’s success over the last decade or so - the opening has been a bit neglected. Yes the middle order deserves all the flak and resurrection in that department should be executed with priority but you cannot overlook the constant failure of the openers to deliver what is expected of them. Sehwag & Gambhir has been India’s best opening combine in terms of runs and also the longest serving duo. When you have the same pair at the top, you either don’t have too many options or they are doing too well to disturb; 23 opening stands of 50 or more & 10 stands of 100+ out of 76 outings is a reasonable stat and should endorse the latter view. Dissect that stat a bit and a few creepy things crop up. The duo has managed to provide an opening stand of 100 or more only on 3 occasions out of 34 times they have gone out to open the batting on ...
2 comments
Read more

Should Cricket Embrace The 5 Rings?

Another glorious edition of the Olympics goes into the sunset. A couple of weeks that showcased the best athletes compete for the ultimate glory, an event that exhibited disappointment, defeat, joy, pride, victory, glory and a portrait that had participation from 204 nations! A rich history, a massive platform, unparalleled glory and probably the biggest show sports can offer, makes an Olympic Games edition stand out. Ardent cricket fans/followers would feel left out from this marquee sports event. Unlike Motorsports, Cricket is a recognized by the International Olympic Committee. Though cricket wasn’t an outright success in multi-sport models previously, times have changed and today cricket has its T20 avatar to offer for such events. The ICC has 105 countries as its recognized members, spanning continents and covering most of the globe.
2 comments
Read more