Skip to main content

Have Different Players For Each Format!

The Indian team has been hit by a transitional phase and poor collective form simultaneously. Lack of long-term planning in the recent past doesn’t help in this situation either. The results and the lack of options emphasize that the Indian team management has not been prepared for immediate life in the absence of the legendary core. The fall-outs? India has had 14 new test caps and 16 in ODI’s in the last 3 years and yet the pool of squad doesn’t resonate of being a stable one. The new addition to the list of ODI debutants would be Cheteshwar Pujara. Almost everybody saw it coming, but personally I am a little apprehensive about him being pushed into the colored jersey at this moment. The concern is not whether he can play one-day cricket, but more about the timing of his entry in this format.

When Gambhir was going through a purple patch 3 seasons ago, everybody felt India had found its Mr. Technique. Push in a couple of IPL seasons and hordes of 50-over series and Gambhir is finding it hard to rediscover his touch and his dismissals are exaggerating the flaws in his ‘technique’. R Ashwin burst on to the scene with a couple of brilliant series with the ball and bat. Harbhajan’s waning form and Ashwin’s rise coincided and Ashwin was promoted as India’s top spinner. Two seasons later Ashwin’s variations are not novel anymore and his stock deliveries aren’t penetrative enough.

Too much cricket is the ‘taken-for-granted’ reason for such observations, but rather too much of too different cricket could be one. Rohit Sharma is often slammed for not exercising his talent to deliver, and rightly so, but is he allowed to play the right format for his game? Similarly Ashwin’s bunch of magic deliveries is a delightful package for a 4-over/10-over spell but is found wanting when he is expected to bowl 20-25 overs a day. Gambhir’s dabs behind square are a by-product of generating a run-scoring option in limited overs cricket.

Certain players are excellent for a certain format and a misfit for a different format, and there should be no shame in accepting that. Certain players are flexible enough to adapt seamlessly, a few others cannot. Raina’s impeccable finishing abilities have very few parallels in world cricket at the moment, but given his style of play at the moment, he cannot be India’s mainstay in test cricket over a period of time. It is time to recognize these facts and get the meticulous conservative money saving attitude into selections: invest the right players for the right formats, and freeze their potentials to one format (if they are found inadequate for other forms). Pujara may click in the one-day format and this experience may enhance his potential as a batsman, but isn’t there a possibility of losing a technically correct pivot in the traditionally stroke-player full test line-up, especially during his budding years? Isn’t it a valid suggestion to ask for a certain set of bowlers to play only one kind of cricket?

The team and the fans should come out of the denial mode and accept that the team is devoid of legends. Those playing might be great-players-in-the-making but let us not force them to breach the fine line between good and great. The timing of early days in international cricket could be dissimilar for different players. Pujara’s test debut came at a time when the team was the number one side, but he enters the ODI squad when the team is on SOS mode! In India (and probably true for other sub-continental sides as well) every new promising talent that performs immediately is touted as the next Sachin, Dravid, Kumble or Zaheer. If the Tendulkars and Kumbles of the world came along so easily then Indian cricket could have had a completely different story to tell.

The underlying message is to let young players trace their own paths. A team in a transitional phase is expected to find a new process, long-term options and not very high success rates; Indian fans/followers should accept that and back the team through this phase and the management should indulge in those processes keeping the bigger picture in mind.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should Cricket Embrace The 5 Rings?

Another glorious edition of the Olympics goes into the sunset. A couple of weeks that showcased the best athletes compete for the ultimate glory, an event that exhibited disappointment, defeat, joy, pride, victory, glory and a portrait that had participation from 204 nations! A rich history, a massive platform, unparalleled glory and probably the biggest show sports can offer, makes an Olympic Games edition stand out. Ardent cricket fans/followers would feel left out from this marquee sports event. Unlike Motorsports, Cricket is a recognized by the International Olympic Committee. Though cricket wasn’t an outright success in multi-sport models previously, times have changed and today cricket has its T20 avatar to offer for such events. The ICC has 105 countries as its recognized members, spanning continents and covering most of the globe.

Adieu Rahul Dravid

It could have been timed better, it could have come a little later, it could have been better celebrated but the retirement was always going to come some day. It is easier said than fathomed - the Indian test side without Dravid! The news on first instance was a moment of disbelief, followed by a moment of daze before logic struck saying that it had to come and the moment had indeed arrived. Dravid was never a glamorous character on or off the field, more of a thorough gentleman commanding respect from all quarters. His announcement was synonymous with his usual self - calm, composed, dignified and non-fussy. Dravid was, is and will always be remembered as a role model for his conduct, dignity, selflessness  on the cricket field & off it  along-with his technically impeccable batting. On the global scene the game has lost one of its modern-day great and an all-time legend. The clock was ticking for Dravid much before, but an exceptional tour of England postponed this event (

More Than Just An Aberrational Dip

As the team’s head to London for the final test of the series, 2-1 is not an unimagined scoreline at the beginning of the tour and in most ways is a fair reflection of superior execution of skills. The nuances though have a different story to tell - some of England's top performers of this series have emphatically over-achieved (given form and/or ability), while those rated highly in the visitor's camp have grossly under-performed. The form or the lack of it, of two young, promising Indian batsmen has been a source of pronounced scrutiny, disappointment & poor form for the batting unit. While Pujara's problems are restricted to lack of conversion, Kohli is struggling to even getting to that stage. Yes the openers have failed consistently and the lower middle order hasn't provided that assuring cushion, but given Pujara's attributes & Kohli's dream batting form, averages of 25.87 & 13.50 respectively are frustrating for themselves, the team &