Skip to main content

Have Different Players For Each Format!

The Indian team has been hit by a transitional phase and poor collective form simultaneously. Lack of long-term planning in the recent past doesn’t help in this situation either. The results and the lack of options emphasize that the Indian team management has not been prepared for immediate life in the absence of the legendary core. The fall-outs? India has had 14 new test caps and 16 in ODI’s in the last 3 years and yet the pool of squad doesn’t resonate of being a stable one. The new addition to the list of ODI debutants would be Cheteshwar Pujara. Almost everybody saw it coming, but personally I am a little apprehensive about him being pushed into the colored jersey at this moment. The concern is not whether he can play one-day cricket, but more about the timing of his entry in this format.

When Gambhir was going through a purple patch 3 seasons ago, everybody felt India had found its Mr. Technique. Push in a couple of IPL seasons and hordes of 50-over series and Gambhir is finding it hard to rediscover his touch and his dismissals are exaggerating the flaws in his ‘technique’. R Ashwin burst on to the scene with a couple of brilliant series with the ball and bat. Harbhajan’s waning form and Ashwin’s rise coincided and Ashwin was promoted as India’s top spinner. Two seasons later Ashwin’s variations are not novel anymore and his stock deliveries aren’t penetrative enough.

Too much cricket is the ‘taken-for-granted’ reason for such observations, but rather too much of too different cricket could be one. Rohit Sharma is often slammed for not exercising his talent to deliver, and rightly so, but is he allowed to play the right format for his game? Similarly Ashwin’s bunch of magic deliveries is a delightful package for a 4-over/10-over spell but is found wanting when he is expected to bowl 20-25 overs a day. Gambhir’s dabs behind square are a by-product of generating a run-scoring option in limited overs cricket.

Certain players are excellent for a certain format and a misfit for a different format, and there should be no shame in accepting that. Certain players are flexible enough to adapt seamlessly, a few others cannot. Raina’s impeccable finishing abilities have very few parallels in world cricket at the moment, but given his style of play at the moment, he cannot be India’s mainstay in test cricket over a period of time. It is time to recognize these facts and get the meticulous conservative money saving attitude into selections: invest the right players for the right formats, and freeze their potentials to one format (if they are found inadequate for other forms). Pujara may click in the one-day format and this experience may enhance his potential as a batsman, but isn’t there a possibility of losing a technically correct pivot in the traditionally stroke-player full test line-up, especially during his budding years? Isn’t it a valid suggestion to ask for a certain set of bowlers to play only one kind of cricket?

The team and the fans should come out of the denial mode and accept that the team is devoid of legends. Those playing might be great-players-in-the-making but let us not force them to breach the fine line between good and great. The timing of early days in international cricket could be dissimilar for different players. Pujara’s test debut came at a time when the team was the number one side, but he enters the ODI squad when the team is on SOS mode! In India (and probably true for other sub-continental sides as well) every new promising talent that performs immediately is touted as the next Sachin, Dravid, Kumble or Zaheer. If the Tendulkars and Kumbles of the world came along so easily then Indian cricket could have had a completely different story to tell.

The underlying message is to let young players trace their own paths. A team in a transitional phase is expected to find a new process, long-term options and not very high success rates; Indian fans/followers should accept that and back the team through this phase and the management should indulge in those processes keeping the bigger picture in mind.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Adieu Rahul Dravid

It could have been timed better, it could have come a little later, it could have been better celebrated but the retirement was always going to come some day. It is easier said than fathomed - the Indian test side without Dravid! The news on first instance was a moment of disbelief, followed by a moment of daze before logic struck saying that it had to come and the moment had indeed arrived. Dravid was never a glamorous character on or off the field, more of a thorough gentleman commanding respect from all quarters. His announcement was synonymous with his usual self - calm, composed, dignified and non-fussy. Dravid was, is and will always be remembered as a role model for his conduct, dignity, selflessness  on the cricket field & off it  along-with his technically impeccable batting. On the global scene the game has lost one of its modern-day great and an all-time legend. The clock was ticking for Dravid much before, but an exceptional tour of England postpone...
4 comments
Read more

India's problems begin from the top!

The middle order of India’s batting line-up has been the focus of all the criticism in the last couple of months. Amidst this chatter, an aspect of India’s success over the last decade or so - the opening has been a bit neglected. Yes the middle order deserves all the flak and resurrection in that department should be executed with priority but you cannot overlook the constant failure of the openers to deliver what is expected of them. Sehwag & Gambhir has been India’s best opening combine in terms of runs and also the longest serving duo. When you have the same pair at the top, you either don’t have too many options or they are doing too well to disturb; 23 opening stands of 50 or more & 10 stands of 100+ out of 76 outings is a reasonable stat and should endorse the latter view. Dissect that stat a bit and a few creepy things crop up. The duo has managed to provide an opening stand of 100 or more only on 3 occasions out of 34 times they have gone out to open the batting on ...
2 comments
Read more

Should Cricket Embrace The 5 Rings?

Another glorious edition of the Olympics goes into the sunset. A couple of weeks that showcased the best athletes compete for the ultimate glory, an event that exhibited disappointment, defeat, joy, pride, victory, glory and a portrait that had participation from 204 nations! A rich history, a massive platform, unparalleled glory and probably the biggest show sports can offer, makes an Olympic Games edition stand out. Ardent cricket fans/followers would feel left out from this marquee sports event. Unlike Motorsports, Cricket is a recognized by the International Olympic Committee. Though cricket wasn’t an outright success in multi-sport models previously, times have changed and today cricket has its T20 avatar to offer for such events. The ICC has 105 countries as its recognized members, spanning continents and covering most of the globe.
2 comments
Read more