Skip to main content

The Million Dollar Problem Between 4 & 5!


Indian cricket is never short of a subject for debate & analysis and currently it’s the constitution of the bowling attack that is the topic of discussion. This subject isn’t new and is going on for a while now. The turn of the millennium saw the revival of Indian cricket as a potent force in limited overs cricket under Ganguly, Dravid and later MSD. Part of the process had to do with the team adopting a flexible approach; Dravid keeping wickets creating space for a batsman, Irfan's batting skills harnessed, and lately Yuvraj as a regular bowler in the colored avatar. There is one thing in all that which hasn't changed - the basic outline of the team with 6 batsmen, 4 bowlers and a keeper, with the notion that Irfan will be a bowler first and Yuvraj will be a batsman first.

Indian bowling attacks have never been threatening as a unit but have been efficient with all the ability they have. This feature works pretty well for limited overs cricket as the winner is decided on the number of runs scored. On paper the bowling chosen for the T20 WC appears pretty formidable with respect to IPL stats but somehow the on-field attack has a certain vacuum. Teams flying into Sri Lanka have carried the traditional mindset about sub-continental tracks (including India) but instead we have a greenish tinge, good carry and a nip in the air, though not outrageous swing and seam.

The 4 bowler theory has received some flak whenever it hasn't worked or when it appears to possess gigantic loopholes, yet there is something which keeps it going for the team management. Experts have advocated for the 5 bowler theory when the team has Ashwin and Irfan who don't qualify as typical tail-enders. The fifth bowler may provide a dimension and act as insurance for the rest. It is not that India hasn't trialed this but the exercise has been too rare to derive conclusions. In theory the 5 bowler set-up appears flawless but there is something discomforting about 5 frontline bowlers and Indian teams. India wouldn't mind the extra bowler for batsmen friendly tracks but can't have that for places like England and South Africa where the batting does need that extra cover. The theory doesn't find acceptance in all formats either; rarely has there been talk of 5 bowlers in test sides. Bottom-line - India will always find embracing the 5 bowler logic pretty sticky!

In T20 cricket you don't really need an expert to bowl you 4 overs if the other 16 are decent. The team management probably works on this principle and cushions its batting and fielding with likes of a Rohit Sharma, to ensure that the extra 20 runs are got scored every innings and a few saved in the field. The problem at the moment lies in completing the 16 rather than the gambled 4. Zaheer isn't in the pink of health or form, Balaji and Pathan appear one-dimensional and likes of Harbhajan and Dinda (in the waiting) don't appear to be justifiable replacements. When your strike player is struggling it can have a cascading effect which is the case with Zaheer and the bowling attack. Traditionally India has tinkered with the men constituting the attack rather than including the extra person in such situations; the indications suggest that the team could do exactly the opposite over the next couple of weeks!

India doesn't have the luxury of having a Kallis in the side, a genuine all-rounder for all seasons, and hence you find the patchwork arrangement with the bowling. There is a mindset issue as well, with every possible all-rounder expected to deliver aka Watson, Kallis et al. India's strength has been the batting and as long as MSD and the management devise plans on the assumption that bowlers will concede 160-170 every game and trust in the batsmen is intact, you shouldn't expect changes for this policy. India's problems have been compounded with Sehwag, Gambhir and Zaheer struggling for form simultaneously. It is very difficult to modify plans between tournaments but the team has to come up with quick solutions or else England 2009 and West Indies 2010 will be followed by Sri Lanka 2012 pretty soon. Like the UPA-2 government the Indian team is struggling with having long term policy decisions in order and doesn't appear that either case will have an answer in the recent future!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Captaincy Conundrum!

8 teams, 60 matches and 7 ‘Indian’ skippers (discounting Duminy and Miller) constituted the recently concluded 9th edition of the Indian Premier League. This featured 2 new teams, unfamiliar captains (Raina, Vijay), seasoned IPL leaders (Gambhir, Rohit, Dhoni), a motivational veteran (Zaheer Khan) and Indian cricket’s man of the moment - Virat Kohli captaining a powerful side. Right through pre-tournament previews till the beginning of the finals, Sunrisers Hyderabad (SRH) wasn’t the most fancied team in the competition. The team was led by the only non-Indian skipper - David Warner, who didn’t have any prior experience of leading Australia. The middle order appeared fragile and injuries to experienced Indian international players (Nehra and Yuvraj) added to the perceptual woes.
Quietly and probably facilitated by the lack of attention, SRH managed to string in consistent wins and stay in the hunt for the title. The template of SRH was designed to ensure penetration with the new ball …

Which Kohli Will Turn Up For The 2017-18 Season?

1st ODI, India vs England, Pune, 15 January 2017. Score 63-4. Dhoni has just been dismissed. The original target of 351, now reads 288 off 229. Kohli is batting on 27*. India’s trio of all-rounders, relatively unfancied, to follow. Kohli scores his 17th hundred in a run-chase, but the hero of the day is Kedar Jadhav whose prominence in the 200-run stand with Kohli took the game away from the opposition. Kohli the batsman extends his incredible record of successful hundreds in run-chases to 17, but Kohli the captain (leading in only his 18th ODI) has found a bankable lower-middle order batsman; the latter more critical as there only 2 more games to play to before India defends its Champions Trophy title in England later in the year.
1st Test, India vs Australia, Pune, 23-25 February 2017. An extraordinarily dry surface greets the opening contest of the big ticket series. India dismiss Australia for 260 after losing the toss. Kohli walks in to bat at 44-2. Two balls later Kohli is back in …

Satisfactory Grades In A Tough Examination!

The googly from Amit Mishra on the last delivery of the 85th over of Sri Lanka’s second innings overwhelmed the number 11 batsman Nuwan Pradeep and sealed a famous, rare series win for India in the island nation. Celebrations, accolades followed and a sense of satisfaction settled on the contemplation of India’s away tours’ log-book for the last two seasons (Oct 2013-Sep 2015). India travelled to 6 test-playing nations within ~21 months, played 17 matches, won only 3 but ticked a lot of boxes affirmatively.
Vijay, Dhawan, Pujara, Kohli, Rohit, Rahane, Dhoni were India’s top 7 in the first test against South Africa in Johannesburg in December 2013; Rahul, Pujara, Rahane, Kohli, Rohit, Binny, Naman Ojha formed the top 7 in the latest test at Colombo versus Sri Lanka. Ashwin, Zaheer, Ishant, Shami were the frontline bowlers then and Ashwin, Mishra, Ishant, Umesh in the recently concluded test. Dhoni retired (from tests) in that phase, likes of Gambhir & more recently Harbhajan were g…