Skip to main content

The Perplexity Of Batting Powerplays!

A 92-run resurrection stand in a final between number 3 & 4, last 15 overs of the innings coming up; wickets in hand, bowling pressure subsided, momentum & foundation. On an ideal day and/or on a flat deck the batting team would be projecting at least 110-130 in that span, subject to the batting powerplay (if unused) not going the bowling team’s way! 8 years and over a 1000 ODI’s since the introduction of ‘batting’ powerplays, the effective usage of those 5 overs still remains far from perfection; and Sri Lanka was the latest victim of the counter-effects of the batting powerplay!

It wasn’t all that bad to start with. In fact 30 runs came in the first 2.4 overs of the 30 delivery installment, 6 runs and 3 wickets followed in the succeeding 2.2 overs. Set batsmen removed, momentum busted and suddenly the last ten became too many for survival! Sudden momentum change in cricket is not a new thing, what is surprising is the frequency at which the ‘batting’ powerplays are shifting the momentum in the direction least expected.

ODI outcomes are backing the thought of modifying the powerplay rules - to stir up excitement in the cumbersome middle overs. Experts and analysts have been suggesting patterns or possible methodologies to deal with the 5 overs, but teams have found that it isn't as straightforward as it appears! With the current set of rules permitting the execution of field restrictions between over number 16 and 40 it becomes imperative for the batting teams to perturb with the old-school format of a set pair batting till the 40th-42nd over and leaving it to madness thereafter.

The dilemma is greater for teams with a couple of sheet anchor players in the top order; can’t allow them to be dismissed prematurely, neither allow the advantage to go waste! A popular illustration in memory is of India in World Cup 2011. The team struggled with the timing of this powerplay, in process conceded decisive momentum to the opposition while batting first on a couple of occasions. Those examples demonstrated precisely why batting units with a set routine dislike the abrupt push for scoring quickly.

The tendency of skippers (by taking the powerplay between over 36 and 40) is to look at the timing of the batting powerplay as an extension of the last 10 overs. Wickets in hand, flat deck, men inside circle augur well and the expectations inflate. By this presumption there is very little room for failure or a back-up plan, as the stakes of scoring in the final overs are very high! On the contrary the field restrictions in overs 16-30, which is rarely chosen, with a modest yield can be a better risk option. The argument/rationale behind not taking the batting powerplay between overs 16 and 30 is generally ascribed to avoiding possible perturbation to the schematic that has been followed over the years.

Stats always have a story to tell, but sometimes it is perception and mental preparation which drives instinct. The perception about batting powerplays not aiding the batting side in terms of momentum is growing at the moment. Consequently certain teams are looking at these 5 overs with humble desires; rather ensuring that the wickets column post this period doesn’t surge. Fielding captains are apprehensive about the number of fielders inside the circle, but last few years have illustrated that blocking singles in the powerplay phase can induce false shots. Bowlers and fielding units wouldn’t mind this growing outlook, and can back themselves to become better death bowlers.

Surely the cricket committee’s idea of introducing sets of fielding restriction was not to create a maze for the batting teams, if anything it was contrary to that! As it has turned out batting teams are more confused about the timing and utilization rather than being happy about its presence. Opening and finishing business in ODI cricket was very different in the 80s & early 90s than it is today, no reason why somebody with some ‘out-of-the-box’ thought shouldn’t pop up revolutionizing the middle overs passage by utilizing the batting powerplay as a tool!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Adieu Rahul Dravid

It could have been timed better, it could have come a little later, it could have been better celebrated but the retirement was always going to come some day. It is easier said than fathomed - the Indian test side without Dravid! The news on first instance was a moment of disbelief, followed by a moment of daze before logic struck saying that it had to come and the moment had indeed arrived. Dravid was never a glamorous character on or off the field, more of a thorough gentleman commanding respect from all quarters. His announcement was synonymous with his usual self - calm, composed, dignified and non-fussy. Dravid was, is and will always be remembered as a role model for his conduct, dignity, selflessness  on the cricket field & off it  along-with his technically impeccable batting. On the global scene the game has lost one of its modern-day great and an all-time legend. The clock was ticking for Dravid much before, but an exceptional tour of England postpone...
4 comments
Read more

India's problems begin from the top!

The middle order of India’s batting line-up has been the focus of all the criticism in the last couple of months. Amidst this chatter, an aspect of India’s success over the last decade or so - the opening has been a bit neglected. Yes the middle order deserves all the flak and resurrection in that department should be executed with priority but you cannot overlook the constant failure of the openers to deliver what is expected of them. Sehwag & Gambhir has been India’s best opening combine in terms of runs and also the longest serving duo. When you have the same pair at the top, you either don’t have too many options or they are doing too well to disturb; 23 opening stands of 50 or more & 10 stands of 100+ out of 76 outings is a reasonable stat and should endorse the latter view. Dissect that stat a bit and a few creepy things crop up. The duo has managed to provide an opening stand of 100 or more only on 3 occasions out of 34 times they have gone out to open the batting on ...
2 comments
Read more

Time to resurrect!

In sport if winning is a habit, losing too can be one! Don’t think need to elaborate what that statement has relevance to the Indian cricket team. World Cup winners, number one ranked test side were attributes you associated with the men in blue not too long ago and you don’t need any experts to say that things are drastically different now. 8 away consecutive test losses, just 6 wins in the last 18 away ODI’s is a record that speaks volumes about the sudden slide the Indian team has experienced. India won the inaugural T20 World Cup, hosts the glamorous IPL and yet the team hasn’t put up a strong T20 performance post the 2007 championship. Bottomline - the team has a lot on its plate with the problems covering the entire spectrum! It is easy to be astonished the way the team has performed post the grand win in Mumbai; it is imperative we start drawing reasons for such a slide and propose ways to rectify the issues. It is a clichéd argument if you are an avid cricket follower - ...
1 comment
Read more