Skip to main content

Have Different Players For Each Format!

The Indian team has been hit by a transitional phase and poor collective form simultaneously. Lack of long-term planning in the recent past doesn’t help in this situation either. The results and the lack of options emphasize that the Indian team management has not been prepared for immediate life in the absence of the legendary core. The fall-outs? India has had 14 new test caps and 16 in ODI’s in the last 3 years and yet the pool of squad doesn’t resonate of being a stable one. The new addition to the list of ODI debutants would be Cheteshwar Pujara. Almost everybody saw it coming, but personally I am a little apprehensive about him being pushed into the colored jersey at this moment. The concern is not whether he can play one-day cricket, but more about the timing of his entry in this format.

When Gambhir was going through a purple patch 3 seasons ago, everybody felt India had found its Mr. Technique. Push in a couple of IPL seasons and hordes of 50-over series and Gambhir is finding it hard to rediscover his touch and his dismissals are exaggerating the flaws in his ‘technique’. R Ashwin burst on to the scene with a couple of brilliant series with the ball and bat. Harbhajan’s waning form and Ashwin’s rise coincided and Ashwin was promoted as India’s top spinner. Two seasons later Ashwin’s variations are not novel anymore and his stock deliveries aren’t penetrative enough.

Too much cricket is the ‘taken-for-granted’ reason for such observations, but rather too much of too different cricket could be one. Rohit Sharma is often slammed for not exercising his talent to deliver, and rightly so, but is he allowed to play the right format for his game? Similarly Ashwin’s bunch of magic deliveries is a delightful package for a 4-over/10-over spell but is found wanting when he is expected to bowl 20-25 overs a day. Gambhir’s dabs behind square are a by-product of generating a run-scoring option in limited overs cricket.

Certain players are excellent for a certain format and a misfit for a different format, and there should be no shame in accepting that. Certain players are flexible enough to adapt seamlessly, a few others cannot. Raina’s impeccable finishing abilities have very few parallels in world cricket at the moment, but given his style of play at the moment, he cannot be India’s mainstay in test cricket over a period of time. It is time to recognize these facts and get the meticulous conservative money saving attitude into selections: invest the right players for the right formats, and freeze their potentials to one format (if they are found inadequate for other forms). Pujara may click in the one-day format and this experience may enhance his potential as a batsman, but isn’t there a possibility of losing a technically correct pivot in the traditionally stroke-player full test line-up, especially during his budding years? Isn’t it a valid suggestion to ask for a certain set of bowlers to play only one kind of cricket?

The team and the fans should come out of the denial mode and accept that the team is devoid of legends. Those playing might be great-players-in-the-making but let us not force them to breach the fine line between good and great. The timing of early days in international cricket could be dissimilar for different players. Pujara’s test debut came at a time when the team was the number one side, but he enters the ODI squad when the team is on SOS mode! In India (and probably true for other sub-continental sides as well) every new promising talent that performs immediately is touted as the next Sachin, Dravid, Kumble or Zaheer. If the Tendulkars and Kumbles of the world came along so easily then Indian cricket could have had a completely different story to tell.

The underlying message is to let young players trace their own paths. A team in a transitional phase is expected to find a new process, long-term options and not very high success rates; Indian fans/followers should accept that and back the team through this phase and the management should indulge in those processes keeping the bigger picture in mind.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Adieu Rahul Dravid

It could have been timed better, it could have come a little later, it could have been better celebrated but the retirement was always going to come some day. It is easier said than fathomed - the Indian test side without Dravid! The news on first instance was a moment of disbelief, followed by a moment of daze before logic struck saying that it had to come and the moment had indeed arrived. Dravid was never a glamorous character on or off the field, more of a thorough gentleman commanding respect from all quarters. His announcement was synonymous with his usual self - calm, composed, dignified and non-fussy. Dravid was, is and will always be remembered as a role model for his conduct, dignity, selflessness  on the cricket field & off it  along-with his technically impeccable batting. On the global scene the game has lost one of its modern-day great and an all-time legend. The clock was ticking for Dravid much before, but an exceptional tour of England postpone...
4 comments
Read more

Time For Double-G To Step Up?

The talk around West Bengal government’s spontaneous response to KKR’s win has almost evaporated a developing thought out of our minds - Gautam Gambhir’s leadership skills! Experts, fans, people in the media believed that it was ‘Double-G’ (as Danny M would like to call it!) who turned things around for KKR since the teams were reshuffled via the auction last year. KKR couldn’t breach the play-offs last year, but ensured that the momentum and all round skills that they sustained during the league stages concluded with winning the IPL trophy this season. So how big is the role of the captain in a T20 tournament? Or is the hype purely because he captained a side that won? It is a never-ending debate on the subject of difficulties as a captain in different formats; though one can safely assume that leading a side in different formats has different challenges. Gambhir isn’t a flamboyant kind of leader, or super-cool aka MS Dhoni but in his own way ensures that he yields the most out...
Post a Comment
Read more

Balancing the Thin Line

Cricket is, inarguably, a very descriptive sport. Comprehending all the rules, and nuances therein, can be an arduous task. While the number of regulations is itself a long list, interpreting them is often tricky, especially on instances when diverging opinions can be derived from a single event. Among the multiple ways of dismissing a batter, the most contentious is probably that of running out the non-striker by the bowler in his run-up before completing the delivery. It has commanded extraordinary attention over the last few years and serves a fitting example for conflicting perceptions. With ever increasing focus, is it time to revisit the scope of the dismissal, and look at options which can discourage batters, in general, from crossing the line? Spirit of cricket is usually invoked whenever a batter is run out at the non-striker end before a delivery is bowled. Cricket is a contest between a bat and ball; such a run-out invariably nullifies the essence and is notionally unfair. T...
Post a Comment
Read more