Skip to main content

India's All-rounder Obsession!


India’s 16 that were picked for the Sri Lankan tour originally didn’t have an ‘all-rounder’; a few eyebrows rose as a consequence. A fast bowler gets injured and an all-rounder is drafted into the mix as the replacement! Indian team selections or replacements have never been flawless, in terms of reasoning or justification, and neither been according to logic, at times!

The debate around Irfan getting a chance at international cricket is a different topic altogether. The bigger picture is that around the obsession surrounding the word ‘all-rounder’ in and around India’s cricketing circles. How would you define an all-rounder in cricket? It is such a subjective question to answer and more so when we have a habit of analyzing the game so much that we demand a certain set of numbers to qualify a player as an all-rounder.

The legacy of the all-rounder community is pretty rich; Kapil Dev, Ian Botham, Imran Khan et al. The modern day generation has names like Flintoff, Kallis, Cairns, Harris, Razzaq and currently Shakib Al Hasan, Watson, Hafeez etc. What knit these names together are their performances in 50-over or the impact their dual armory (fielding not included as it may or may not be an attribute) has had in ODI cricket. Test cricket and test teams are generally chosen with specialists forming the core and the all-rounder, if any, is expected to chip in. In 50-over cricket the all-rounder is the go-to man for the captain; can expect him to deliver as a floater in the batting order or throw the ball to him to break a partnership. In T20 cricket you don’t need a ‘genuine’ all-rounder to constitute your line-up, for part-time bowlers or pinch-hitters can satiate that requirement.

50-over cricket is thus the ideal format for an all-rounder to display and maximize his dual skills. If statistics are the basis, India has had in its history only 20 all-rounder (min. 500 runs and 25 wickets in ODI cricket); 20 out of 193 that have played ODI cricket for India! India’s obsession (fans, media, team, critics included) for a genuine all-rounder have never been fictitious but have never had an answer. Robin Singh, Ravi Shastri, Manoj Prabhakar, Ajay Jadeja were a few names that contested for the role of the allrounder. Recently we have had Agarkar, Irfan, Ravindra Jadeja, and Yusuf Pathan featuring in that role. Indian cricket followers have never been satisfied with the execution of the role of any player in the shoes of ‘all-rounder’; either the player is forced to squeeze one attribute of his arsenal or expected to be infallible in either skill!

It is a fact that India has never managed to produce ‘the-genuine’ all-rounder; there could be a few reasons for that. Indian culture hasn’t produced too many physically strong cricket players. School cricket, domestic cricket doesn’t encourage dual skilled players, as subsequent promotion is based more on numbers. Selectors aren’t clear with what they expect the all-rounder to deliver, consequently creeping in confusion. India won the world cup last year without major contributions from the ‘genuine’ all-rounder but rather from a batsman who could fill in 10 overs with success. The all-rounder puzzle continues to remain an unsolved mystery in Indian cricket and the search to find the missing link doesn’t cease. Irfan Pathan is back in the fold; will have an opportunity to prove a point, but like Sidharth Monga suggests he himself remains a bit of a puzzle! MS Dhoni may or may not be satisfied with Irfan’s inclusion but for an Indian fan’s sake the inclusion of a genuine ‘all-rounder’ is a reassuring move!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tracking The Virat Progress!

It has been 5 years, 7 months and 182 matches since a certain Virat Kohli made his international debut. 8089 runs have come off his bat since then which accounts for 17.86% of runs scored by all Indian batsmen (in the matches involving Kohli); and improves to 19.77% in winning causes. 19 of his 25 tons have been hit when India has won, he has been the second highest run-getter in international cricket over the last 3 years and has a 3-figure knock against & in every test playing nation. These are featured highlights which you probably read every day and sometimes a large database smudges the nuances of each achievement. After India’s win over Bangladesh in the World T20 2014 league game (including a clinical knock of 57*), in a brief chat Virat spoke something which was delightfully pleasing for all those who have tracked his assured graduation. From being accompanied with adjectives like brash and impulsive, he can now boast of words like mature, thinker and responsible abou...
1 comment
Read more

Adieu Rahul Dravid

It could have been timed better, it could have come a little later, it could have been better celebrated but the retirement was always going to come some day. It is easier said than fathomed - the Indian test side without Dravid! The news on first instance was a moment of disbelief, followed by a moment of daze before logic struck saying that it had to come and the moment had indeed arrived. Dravid was never a glamorous character on or off the field, more of a thorough gentleman commanding respect from all quarters. His announcement was synonymous with his usual self - calm, composed, dignified and non-fussy. Dravid was, is and will always be remembered as a role model for his conduct, dignity, selflessness  on the cricket field & off it  along-with his technically impeccable batting. On the global scene the game has lost one of its modern-day great and an all-time legend. The clock was ticking for Dravid much before, but an exceptional tour of England postpone...
4 comments
Read more

Balancing the Thin Line

Cricket is, inarguably, a very descriptive sport. Comprehending all the rules, and nuances therein, can be an arduous task. While the number of regulations is itself a long list, interpreting them is often tricky, especially on instances when diverging opinions can be derived from a single event. Among the multiple ways of dismissing a batter, the most contentious is probably that of running out the non-striker by the bowler in his run-up before completing the delivery. It has commanded extraordinary attention over the last few years and serves a fitting example for conflicting perceptions. With ever increasing focus, is it time to revisit the scope of the dismissal, and look at options which can discourage batters, in general, from crossing the line? Spirit of cricket is usually invoked whenever a batter is run out at the non-striker end before a delivery is bowled. Cricket is a contest between a bat and ball; such a run-out invariably nullifies the essence and is notionally unfair. T...
Post a Comment
Read more