About 20
years ago, an Indian team on a tour down under suffered a 0-4 loss in a 5 match
series following a test series loss in England. Don’t know what the outlook about the team was then (as I was too small to follow cricket!), having likes of Vengsarkar, Kapil Dev, Shastri, Srikkanth
in the ranks. Yet that tour is remembered as the tour which gave birth to the
next big thing in Indian cricket - Tendulkar and India’s spearhead bowler for
the next decade - Javagal Srinath. Compare it to the last 8 months; Virat has
been the find with the bat and likes of Ashwin & Umesh have impressed,
albeit in patches. The analogy doesn’t end here itself!
Srikkanth
and Vengsarkar quit test cricket after the final test at Perth, Ravi Shastri
within the next 10 months, Kiran More in 1993 and Kapil Dev 1994. No need to
elaborate why this could be analogous to the current scenario. The larger
thought that needs to be addressed is the lack of lessons learnt to avoid a
similar fate. India won just 1 test in the 28 it played outside India between
the end of that dismal tour and the turn of the millennium. Do note that likes
of Dravid, Laxman, Ganguly, Tendulkar, Kumble were a part of most of those 28
tests. Bottomline: even the great players took time to resurrect the situation
and bring the house in order. Thus wholesale replacements or retirements are no
solution, but change is inevitable and should be executed with priority.
The most
pertinent question which most analysts and fans would be posing is the lack of
changes to the line-up inspite of 7 (and 8th very likely)
consecutive drubbings. Committing mistakes is one thing but not correcting them
is a bigger problem. The alarm bells were ringing after England, but they were
masked if not neglected by putting it as an aberration. The people with power
failed to address the issue then itself, lumbering on with same set of issues. No
modifications were made to the batting line-up that has struggled to notch up individual
hundreds and stack up totals in excess of 300. There are a couple of
no-brainers, in the eyes of most, like the inclusion of Rohit Sharma for Laxman
in the last test (if VVS hasn’t announced any retirement plans) or fluxing
in somebody like Ojha or Mithun which haven't been implemented. India’s has gone too long without making any
change, and there is a high probability of witnessing too many changes within
no time, especially after this tour. Such extremes measures suggest lack of
vision and inability to meet the tough questions head on.
Indian
cricket has traditionally been struck with delayed and lack of timed decisions
which eventually have resulted in consistent poor performances when the going gets tough, especially
abroad. Just when you thought that Indian cricket was going in the right direction,
all of a sudden you are confronted with a situation that can potentially take
the team a long time backward. Many experts believe that the team will take a
long time to recover from this period of continuous bashing and at the moment
that doesn’t seem to be a wrong prediction. The above illustration does speak
about a team’s struggle (especially away) after humiliating losses and
subsequent retirements. So how does an Indian fan react to this? The most
obvious reaction is anger, couple that to media pressure and you get some
panicky selections.
There are
lot of aspects to India’s disappointing two tours and the analysis will keep
going. Experts and analysts will suggest ways to come out this phase, but
ultimately it will boil down to the question of personnel forming the line-up.
While the pressure on Laxman et al. mounts, it becomes imperative to not forget
that the players we are talking about are not ‘just any other’ players and thus
we should put up our emotions in a constructive manner rather than outrageously.
Virat Kohli’s maiden test ton gives a glimmer of hope that the future isn’t as
dark as it would be visualized by many. While the sun is setting for the
legends of the side, new faces should light up a new dawn in Indian cricket. The
Indian fan is the most underrated & underutilised entity in the cricketing
set-up of this country. Rarely do you find public criticism being responded
vocally or used as a tool to draw constructive reasons for the team’s
performance but more often as a source to justify selections. He is the one who
will go after the side when the performances haven’t been good but he is same
person who will wake up the next morning believing in his side and expecting it
to come back stronger, just like most of us do!
So glad to hear rational points of view rather than just an extreme outpouring of emotion in the face of such a succession of Test defeats overseas.
ReplyDelete